​OUR BIGGEST PREDICTION FOR 2026
"Outsourcing Regret to AI"​​
We can’t claim certainty—but we have a strong sense of what may be coming. By 2026, a new kind of AI-driven mental health and addiction tool could begin to emerge, built around one simple, powerful question: What if?
​
Not as an advice engine or diagnostic device loaded into a chatbot (those already exist), but as a safe space for deep personal reflection. A way for people to revisit their own story with less fear and more clarity—to explore what might still be possible, what could change, and what no longer needs to feel inevitable.
​
For people in recovery familiar with “playing the tape,” this would feel immediately recognizable. Only now, the tape wouldn't be a subjective reconstruction in a person's imagination, but rather a richly detailed, generative-AI video, viewable on any phone, with the individual themselves as the central character.
​
Think of it like "would-have-could-have-should-haves" in 4K.
​
We’ve written before about generative AI video as a possible delivery model for experiences like this, and it still feels plausible—not because video is novel or flashy, but because the brain tends to believe what it sees more than what it reads or hears. Seeing an alternative future can land emotionally in ways language alone often cannot.
​
A version of this idea recently surfaced in a popular AI YouTube video, “18 Shocking AI Predictions for 2026,” where the creators unveiled a newly coined phrase: “outsourcing regret.” (It's the final prediction #18 at minute 15:02)
​
The term resonates because regret isn’t just pain—it’s unfinished thinking. It’s the mind compulsively rerunning a story, trying to make it finally make sense. In addiction and depression, that loop can turn brutal: reflection slips into rumination, rumination hardens into shame, and shame narrows the future until relapse or despair begin to feel like the only endings left. What’s been missing is a way to work with regret in a way that allows people to look backward without collapsing and forward without lying to themselves. The tool we imagine emerging wouldn’t promise healing; it would offer rehearsal: a guided, emotionally responsive space where someone can revisit pivotal moments slowly and compassionately, without punishment—not to change the past, but to understand it, to see how different choices lead to different futures, and to grieve the ones that didn’t happen in a way that doesn’t destroy the present.
​​​
If this works, it won’t feel like technology at all. It will feel like agency returning. When regret becomes information instead of a verdict, imagination blossoms. And imagination—sometimes wild and even totally impractical—is one of the most often-overlooked prerequisites for successful recovery.
​
In many ways, this is already familiar territory for us. At RECOVERY MOVIE MEET-UPs, we’ve always treated film as a communal what-if engine. Movies allow people in treatment to step into parallel lives: What if I stayed sober? What if I asked for help sooner? What if I didn’t give up?
But the real power has never been the film alone. It’s what happens afterward—when people speak from inside those imagined paths, hear their own unspoken questions echoed by others, and realize they’re not alone in wondering who they might still become.
That shared act of imagining—grounded in story, deepened through conversation—is what makes the experience therapeutic rather than theoretical. And it’s precisely why RECOVERY MOVIE MEET-UPs programs are being adopted by addiction and mental health treatment centers and recovery organizations across the country: they don’t replace clinical care, they help activate it—by letting people visualize, together, that more than one future is still possible.
What this technology may also add is continuity and intimacy. Where films offer archetypes, these emerging tools could allow people to explore their own branching paths—again and again, privately, without risk. Not only after harm has occurred, but before it does. A teenager standing at the edge of a first drink or drug could evaluate possible outcomes in advance—emotionally, not abstractly—by seeing where that path tends to lead.
Movies spark recognition. Interactive scenarios deepen it. Group conversation restores meaning. Together, they form a loop rather than a one-off intervention.
​
If this unfolds the way we suspect, aftercare may begin to change as well. Instead of white-knuckling the future, people will practice it. They’ll rehearse high-risk moments, mourn un-lived versions of themselves, and try on new identities before stepping into them. Recovery may start to feel less like loss and more like selection—choosing, with eyes open, which life to continue building.
​
That’s why our big prediction for 2026 is that prevention, treatment, and aftercare may increasingly pair symptom-focused, evidence-based care with tools designed to expand imagination. Not as a replacement for therapy, medication, or peer support—but as a complement to them. When people can see credible alternatives to the life they feel trapped in—through film, through generative AI scenarios, through shared reflection—change stops being purely intellectual. It becomes felt.
​​
